In this post I a want to give a short derivation of the replication portfolio and the risk neutral probabilities in the binomial model from Cox-Ross-Rubinstein. Let  be the value of the underlying asset in
 be the value of the underlying asset in  . In a project or investment this might be the present value of the project’s contribution (market related) cash flows. The positive development of
. In a project or investment this might be the present value of the project’s contribution (market related) cash flows. The positive development of  at time
 at time  ,
,  , occurs with probability
, occurs with probability  , the negative development with value
, the negative development with value  in
 in  with probability
 with probability  . The twin security of the underlying in the open market takes a similar notation
. The twin security of the underlying in the open market takes a similar notation  ,
,  ,
,  ,
, . We consider an option with option value
. We consider an option with option value  in
 in  that leads to an option value of
 that leads to an option value of  in the upper state
 in the upper state  and to an option value of
 and to an option value of  in the lower state
 in the lower state  . As result we are searching the option value
. As result we are searching the option value  at time
 at time  .
.
Next we replicate the option value in  by a portfolio of
 by a portfolio of  shares of twin security
 shares of twin security  partly financed by borrowings of amount
 partly financed by borrowings of amount  at the risk-free rate
 at the risk-free rate  . The values of the upper and lower state in
. The values of the upper and lower state in  are
 are  and
 and  .
.
In efficient markets there exist no profitable arbitarge opportunities. Therefore the outcome of the option value  in
 in  must be the same in the upper and in the lower state. Setting
 must be the same in the upper and in the lower state. Setting  we get:
 we get:
      ![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \[n=\frac{E^+-E^-}{S^+-S^-}\]](https://www.financeinvest.at/wp-content/ql-cache/quicklatex.com-0f1b9697c29529cdc9d6fb23d9232485_l3.png)
Replacing
 in the previous equations we obtain the value borrowed at the risk-free rate r:
 in the previous equations we obtain the value borrowed at the risk-free rate r:      ![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \[B=\frac{1}{1+r}\frac{{E^+S^--E}^-S^+}{S^+-S^-}\]](https://www.financeinvest.at/wp-content/ql-cache/quicklatex.com-ac35b5d4ad5fc53d32028c8dc64933fd_l3.png)
The law of one price tells us that the value of assets that lead to the same cash flows must be the same. That means that the value of the option at time
 must be the same as the value of the portfolio at time
 must be the same as the value of the portfolio at time  . Therefore we can set
. Therefore we can set  . With that we calculate the value of the option in
. With that we calculate the value of the option in  :
:      ![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \[E=\frac{\left(\frac{S\left(1+r\right)-S^-}{S^+-S^-}\right)E^++\left(1-\frac{S\left(1+r\right)-S^-}{S^+-S^-}\right)E^-}{1+r}\]](https://www.financeinvest.at/wp-content/ql-cache/quicklatex.com-bccf07b0c1c2c9b722c78bf7bd5bfd44_l3.png)
We create a new variable
 to simplify the previous expression.
 to simplify the previous expression.      ![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \[p^\prime=\frac{S\left(1+r\right)-S^-}{S^+-S^-}\]](https://www.financeinvest.at/wp-content/ql-cache/quicklatex.com-a79fb856ce26df70c2d45b3cf96f8461_l3.png)
Hence we obtain:
      ![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \[E=\frac{p\prime E^++\left(1-p\prime\right)E^-}{1+r}\]](https://www.financeinvest.at/wp-content/ql-cache/quicklatex.com-05a980182c7265f624712db1703bf91c_l3.png)
 can be interpreted as probability for
 can be interpreted as probability for  ,
,  for
 for  .
.  and
 and  are known as risk-neutral probabilities. Note that the value of the option does not explicitly involve the actual probabilities
 are known as risk-neutral probabilities. Note that the value of the option does not explicitly involve the actual probabilities  and
 and  of the underlying. Instead, it is expressed in terms of risk-neutral probabilities. They allow to discount the expected future values at the risk-free rate.
 of the underlying. Instead, it is expressed in terms of risk-neutral probabilities. They allow to discount the expected future values at the risk-free rate.
Discounting at the risk-free rate is the main difference between decision tree analysis  (DTA) and contingent claim analysis (CCA) or real options analysis (ROA). DTA does not take into account that the risk of the cash flow streams changes when you consider options and opportunities. ROA implements this issue correctly.
